Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Wahhhhh!!! Quit Whining, for God's Sake...


Great article reprinted in Alternet.org today about the inability of the Left to celebrate victory. Sure, it's a bummer to see Paul F....g Volcker back in the news, but as the article points out, would you rather see Marxist Leninist Downer-of-all Time Bob Avakian there? I mean, we can--and many probably WILL--sit around and whine about Obama's "move to the Center," as if we're all passive spectators sitting on our couches eating Fritos and burritos, getting flabby, waiting for him to save me, but.....ain't gonna' happen. We have to help him, push him, and "make him" be the best that he can be.

Monday, November 3, 2008

Omigod! Sex and Love United At Last!


If I were French, I'd say that my jouissance was exploding all over the place. I'm not, though--French. The presence of two celestial beings on one stage, in one photo--well, I just have to say that my life's dreams and ambitions have finally--finally--been fulfilled. Thanks to Lorrie Smith, my high school girlfriend -- also my date for the Senior Prom at Rumson-Fairhaven Regional High School where we heard Bruce perform with his band Steel Mill in 1970--for the photo.

Sunday, November 2, 2008

O.K. Despite My Deep Wisdom About Politics, I Sometimes Can't Really Understand


...people who don't really care about folks who are less fortunate. I know the psychology of it, the various sophisticated analyses of the conservative mind offered from geniuses like Michael Lerner or George Lakoff. But when it comes right down to it, a deep and sort of structurally fundamental sense that people get what they deserve, that we should just look out for ourselves, that poor people or people of color are undeserving and fucked up.....well, I just don't really get it. Most principled right wingers are not self-aware, they're not psychologically minded enough to give us a real peek into their hearts and deepest minds, but I'd love to get inside there--just for a minute.

Friday, October 31, 2008

Taking YES For An Answer--Come on! Don't Be Afraid To Celebrate!


Progressives are right not to celebrate Obama’s victory too early. History has shown us that even when we win, the bad guys can steal it. We have to work until the bitter end—and afterwards, if necessary—to insure that our victory is substantial and to defend it against attempts by the Right to rain on our parade again.

So, I suppose it makes sense that when I say, even to a friend, even in private, something like “Man, next Tuesday is going to be one of the greatest days of our lives,” that friend will always have the same emotional reflex—namely fear, caution, and usually some type of grim reservation. For example, “Don’t jinx it, man..it ain’t over ‘till it’s over,” or “yeah, if they don’t find a way to steal it,” or “yeah, or it’ll be the worst day in our lives,” or “Shhh…don’t say it out loud,” or “That’s what we thought in 2000…remember Florida?”

We’ve all been part of such conversations, I’m sure. You just don’t celebrate in advance. It’s bad luck. It’s bad karma. It’s bad juju.

Now, I understand the rationale here, both practically and culturally. Not only is this election not “in the bag,” but such an attitude comes across as unseemly and cocky in general. After all, don’t sports teams routinely position themselves as underdogs even when they’re heavily favored? There’s something universal about the notion that public displays of confidence and exuberance increase the likelihood of failure. It’s the sin of hubris; it’s chutzpah; it’s “the bigger they are, the harder they fall;” it’s knocking on wood, warding off the evil eye, it’s not mentioning a no-hitter—the list could go on. Draw attention to your triumphant feelings and fate, nature, or god will strike you down.

It’s interesting to note that we see a version of this all the time in psychotherapy. People come in to see us often because they are holding themselves back from success or putting themselves down even when reality suggests the opposite. We “choke” all the time in our lives, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. We have a success, but can’t enjoy it. We get a promotion but feel blue and empty. We think a potential partner is great but when we “get” him or her, we find them wanting. We work towards a goal but quit when we near the end. We can’t take compliments but, instead, downplay their credibility. Athletes escape poor beginnings and acquire fame and fortune, but then blow it with drug use or self-destructive violence.

Politically, we’ve seen this all too often on the Left. Union leaders I work with freely admit they’d rather be fighting the boss from “below” than collaborating with them in a position of power. I’ve seen conference after conference seem like it was going well, only to be brought down by infighting over political correctness. We’ve spent so long as outsiders, as disenfranchised, that when we have a chance to get real power, we figure out how to redefine ourselves as righteous victims. So often, the Left can’t take Yes for an answer. So many of our sectarian groups would rather be right than win. Anyone who has been on the Left for any length of time has seen this.

Ultimately, I think that this sensibility is a form of survivor guilt. Survivor guilt is the unconscious belief that one is not supposed to have the good things in life because it will hurt others. It was originally used to describe the guilt that holocaust survivors felt about surviving while others perished. In clinical work, we see it in the various ways that children grow up unconsciously believing that if they have more than others—siblings, parents, peers—that they’ll be punished or that such a victory will threaten their connections to others. So, when we’re “winning,” or on the verge of “winning” something important—an achievement, a pleasure, a new form of mastery, an important recognition or relationship—we get unconsciously worried and guilty. We sort of metaphorically look around and have thoughts like: “what am I doing here? Do I really belong here? Am I really a member of this club? I better not broadcast that fact, or celebrate it too much and draw attention because then I’ll be found out and asked to leave.” It’s one thing to do well, to succeed, even to feel privately proud, but it’s safer to keep our light under a bushel so as not to draw upon us the envy, wrath and ill-fortune that seems seek out those who display too much hubris.

And, yet, we also admire hubris, even as it makes us uncomfortable. In January of 1969, despite being a 17-point underdog, Joe Namath predicted victory over the Baltimore Colts and backed it up with an MVP performance. And who can forget the scene last summer when Usain Bolt, 20 meters from the finish line, looked around, saw he was going to win and actually started to celebrate before the tape? Fans were both awed and a little disturbed by the sheer arrogance of each of these gestures.

I think that progressives can walk and chew gum at the same time in the sense that we can work like the dickens for an Obama victory but also allow ourselves now to anticipate and celebrate a likely victory. We don’t have to do it in public spaces where our enemies can use it as political capital. But we can, I believe, let ourselves really begin to consciously and emotionally register this ecstatic historical moment.

I’m reminded of a Bruce Springsteen song, Lucky Town, in which he’s waking up to the fact that he’s sick of portraying himself as an alienated hard-on-his-luck outsider while his real life has gotten better and better. He sings, “Tonight I’m laying in your arms carving lucky charms out of these hard-luck bones.” I think those of us in the Obama campaign can do the same

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Icarus? Nah--I don't think so...


Seems we can't really celebrate our upcoming victory on Tuesday....too goddamn superstitious, I think. I'm writing an article about it....it's all about survivor guilt...stay tuned!

Sunday, October 26, 2008

A Moment--Just a Moment--of Empathy for the Undecided..


My friend, Larry, pointed out that for some folks, their "vote" is the only thing they can call truly their own, one of the few things that they can exercise with freedom. And then they personalize everything, don't care about the issues really, but react to who "seems" nice or who "seems" strong ---crap like that. So, something like a gaffe or TV wall-to-wall advertising that trades ENTIRELY in images, that reduces everything to a psycho-drama.

Larry is right, I think.

Still, these so called undecided voters can kiss my ass!

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Who Are These Stupid Fucking Undecided Morons...uhh., I Mean Voters?


I think that David Sedaris put it best:

"I look at these people and can't quite believe that they exist. Are they professional actors? I wonder. Or are they simply laymen who want a lot of attention? To put them in perspective, I think of being on an airplane. The flight attendant comes down the aisle with her food cart and, eventually, parks it beside my seat. "Can I interest you in the chicken?" she asks. "Or would you prefer the platter of shit with bits of broken glass in it? To be undecided in this election is to pause for a moment and then ask how the chicken is cooked."

Monday, October 20, 2008

Love Trumps Reason Every Time--Eugene Debs and Barack Obama


In a biography of Eugene Debs, the author describes a meeting in which Debs is speaking. The intensity of the crowd was incredible. And yet, many of those attending didn't speak English and couldn't therefore understand the content of Debs' speech. As one observer put it, "It was not so much that they cared for what he said, but that they cared that he cared for them..."

When asked how they could be so enthusiastic if they couldn't understand Debs, one person in the audience responded simply: "Debs talks to us with his hands, with his heart, and we all understood everything he said."

Obama is smart and progressive in what he says, for sure, but it's his heart that draws these crowds.

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Bill Ayers, Bill Haywood, and Justice in America


Speaking of terrorists, on May 9, 1907, IWW leader Bill Haywood was tried for the killing of former Idaho governor--and vicious union-buster--Frank Steunenberg

The trial was a slam-dunk for the prosecution, except for one thing: Haywood was represented by Clarence Darrow. Here's a section of his famous closing summary:

"I speak for the poor, for the weak, for the weary, for that long line of men who, in darkness and despair, have borne the labors of the human race," Darrow told the jury. "Their eyes are on you twelve men of Idaho tonight. If you should decree Bill Haywood's death, in the railroad offices of our great cities men will applaud your names.… In every bank in the world, where men hate Haywood because he fights for the poor and against that accursed system upon which the favored live and grow rich and fat," they would "receive blessings and unstinted praise." But "Out on our broad prairies where men toil with their hands, out on the wide ocean where men are tossed and buffeted on the waves, through our mills and factories, and down deep under the earth, thousands of men, and of women and children will kneel tonight and ask their God to guide your hearts—these men and women and these little children, the poor, the weak, and the suffering of the world, are stretching out their helpless hands to this jury in mute appeal for Bill Haywood's life."
In my view, both Haywood and Ayers were screwed up and their violence set progressive movements back. But in both cases, they became scapegoats for the most virulent right-wing elements of society to justify their repressive policies.

I guess we need another lawyer from Chicago--like Darrow-- to speak up today for the common man! Oh--right...WE HAVE ONE!

Prescient, No?

Friday, October 17, 2008

The Larger the Organization You're In, the More Alienated the Relationships


It seems to me sad, but true that if you want to play in the big leagues, to really make a difference in the world, you have to work in organizations that have subcultures of competition, non-recognition, and often a misuse of authority.

You can leave and tend your own garden in smaller, healthier groups and institutions, but you give up a certain possibility.

Which is better? I don't know. I've done both. In the end, I suppose I vote for being places where you're loved and appreciated....I guess.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Tired, tired, tired of jingoism....


Jingoism (defintion): Extreme nationalism characterized especially by a belligerent foreign policy; chauvinistic patriotism.

John McCain and his flag-waving Republican war-mongers are a case in point. Aren’t you tired of this constant repetition of self-congratulatory nationalism? Here’s a story that’s a corrective.

From Otto Scharmer’s book Theory U: He tells the story of Rusty Schweickart who was on the Apollo mission that preceded the first moon landing, where they tested the lunar lander in orbit. 10 years later, Rusty figured out how to talk about what had happened. He figured out that the only way to describe it was in the second person, e.g. “now you see this; now you see that.” As Rusty put it: “I was there…..I could see something with my eyes, but it wasn’t just me seeing. It was humankind seeing.”

He goes on: “Now you’re near the end of the mission, and you’re very fortunate because the mission has gone very well technically. And so you have free time that you really had no right to expect. So these last days you actually spend much of the time just looking out the window. And as you look out the window, you realize that your identity has shifted—that for the first several days, whenever you had the chance to look out the window, you looked for the west coast of California, or you looked for Texas, or you looked for the Florida peninsula. You looked for the things that were familiar to you. And then you suddenly realize that you’re now looking forward to the west coast of Africa. And you’re looking forward to the Sinai. And you’re looking forward to the Indian subcontinent. You realized that your identity has shifted, and you are now identifying with all of it.”

“And now you’re well into the last day. And you find yourself just looking. And you’re drifting over that very familiar piece of geography that we call the Middle East. And you’re looking down at this, and suddenly it hits you that there are no boundaries. Every time you’ve seen this before, from the time you were a little child, there were always lines. And you realize that there are no lines. The lines do not exist. Lines only exist because we hold them in our mind as existing. They you realize, at that instant, that people are busy killing each other over those imaginary lines.”

Some days later, someone else asked Rusty “what was it like up there?” Rusty stood there a long time. Then he said, “It was like seeing a baby about to be born.”

Rusty could, finally, see—through a lens of possibility—the sacred totality of the Earth, an Earth without lines.

Is there a politician alive who could say the same?

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

I CAN'T STAND MCCAIN'S PHONY WEIRD SATANIC SMILE


I can't stand it!!! McCain's smile is so phony and hostile and smarmy I want to wring his dry-drunk, surly, volatile, bug-eyed, lying sack-of-shit neck..! Don't you?

Oh--So NOW You're Afraid of an Economic Slowdown?


The NY Times headline today "Dow Down 700 Points As Fears of Economic Slowdown Grow" confuses me. I mean--HAVEN'T YOU FUCKING STOCKOWNING ASSHOLES BEEN READING THE GODDAMN NEWS FOR THE LAST 3 WEEKS? Has ANYBODY you've read said that all of these rescue efforts are going to prevent a significant recession? How come, now, you're suddenly "afraid" of a slowdown? NOW your selling? You're suddenly saying--hey, Gladys, I thought everything was GREAT until today... I'm scared.....Sell...Sell!"

Why don't you all just SELL and then God will come in and announce: "we're at the bottom!" And then I can digest it all, realize that I'll now have to work 'till I'm 93 and get able to get on with life!

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

McCain Might As Well Accuse Obama of Pedophilia


After all, he loves children--his own--right? And while he's at it, why doesn't McCain say that Obama is a diaper-wearer. I mean, he probably once did wear diapers, don't you think? And, I mean--I suppose that Obama was once close to the Black Panther Party, too. Well, he comes from Chicago...and, uh, Bobby Hutton was a famous black panther who was gunned down in Chicago by the cops. Good enough connection, I'd say. And, finally, why not throw in genocide and rape--after all, Obama's father comes from Africa and there have certainly been genocidal conflicts there involving rape, haven't there?

It doesn't matter what they say--they just make shit up, right? And then the Times "corrects" them by saying that there are distortions in their ads. Distortions? Well, like when you report something that is the opposite of the truth, it's a......distortion? NO--YOU FUCKING CHICKEN-SHIT NYTIMES REPORTERS--IT'S A LIE.

Monday, October 13, 2008

McCain, Rabid Dogs and Hitler


I love it that when the Obama camp complained about McCain supporters yelling "kill him" and "traitor", that some dickwad from the McCain camp said-- in effect -- how dare Obama put down the good ordinary people that come out for McCain!
That's like attacking folks who were upset that Hitler drew the "good German people" to his rallies, albeit people who...uhh..like...were anti-semitic and all...

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Heard It Through the Grapevine..


...that there is an incredible new book out about male sexuality--its psychology, politics, and social meaning--by a well known psychoanalyst. It's called Male Sexuality: Why Women Don't Understand It, and Men Don't Either.

It's only available on Amazon because it's so incendiary that the Dept. of Homeland Security, the NSA, and the Catholic Church have banded together to censor its distribution.

Some folks think that it'll be up for a Pulitzer....others say that if the author is assassinated that he'll be put forth for the next Nobel Peace Prize.

Hard to say....either way, I think that he's a drum major for freedom. 'Nuff said.

Saturday, October 11, 2008

What Is It Like--Really--To Be Stupid?


Now, I've spent my life empathizing with people, those I treat and those who oppose us politically. But yesterday I was watching the "town hall" meeting where an older woman was talking to McCain, saying, first, "I don't trust Obama.."--and McCain is nodding--and then she goes on "...because he's an Arab!" -- and McCain starts shaking his head. The woman says, "he's not?" And McCain says No.
Now, I know tha many people in our society are ignorant, uneducated, and gripped with the fear-based prejudices that so often lie at the heart of right-wing, racist, attitudes.
But, really--what the fuck is this old bag thinking? What's it like to be inside her head? Even scumbag rabble-rousers like O'Reilly and big fat idiots like Limbaugh don't literally say "Obama is an Arab." So, I ask again--what is it really like to be inside the skin of this frightened old racist biddy? I don't think that I can really say--can you?

Friday, October 10, 2008

What I Would Say To McCain During Debate Next Wed. If I Were Obama

If I were Obama, I'd say this directly to McCain next Wed.

John--Shame on you. The American people are fearful about their homes, their jobs, their retirement, their children's education and they need someone to call them to their higher selves, to bring them together. Instead, using the time-honored methods of hate-mongers throughout history, you and Governor Palin stoke the flames of those fears by casting aspersions on my patriotism, and by insinuating that I've befriended terrorists. John, when your supporters shout out that I'm a traitor or that someone should kill me, and you and Governor Palin do nothing to stop it, there's a message there, a message that it's o.k. to hate, that American politics is about scapegoating and dirty tricks and not about principles and about bringing people together. These are the same tactics that Richard Nixon used to get elected in 1968 and they're the same tactics that Bush and Rove used against you in South Carolina in 2000. Have you no shame, John? You were and are an American hero. I think that we should have been able to expect that you act like one.


New McCain Ad: A Bad Acid Trip


McCain's new ad targeting Obama's terrorist friend, Bill Ayers, and the De-Regulating Dems who caused the current economic crisis. Watching this is like being inside a bad acid trip. Talk me down!!!

"It's O.K., Michael, it's only 26 more days..."

"No, it's not, it's not....reality doesn't exist...everything is upside down.....inside out...I'm going crazy.....Obama's not a terrorist.....the Dems didn't de-regulate.....did they? Am I psychotic?....Am I really a woman?.....Is our Sun going super-nova?.....are we really all part of a dream that someone--or something--else is having.......? Can people swallow their own lips?...asldfjkas;dl fsjdl; kj?

Help!

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Unions Kick Ass!

Richard Trumpka from the AFL-CIO kicks some big time butt in this video

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

My fellow prisoners


McCain, today, conflated several of his tired salutations--my friend, my fellow Americans, etc.--and said "my fellow prisoners."
A Freudian slip, of course. McCain--a prisoner of his imploding campaign, his archaic ideology, his fundamentalist base, his rabid hate-filled neo-nazi white militants......

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

My friends, my friends, my friends....


my friends, my friends, my friends, my friends, my friends, my friends.......
Hmmm....McCain has few, actually--that's why it seems so phony and irritating. Harry Reid said that he, Reid, didn't like McCain and hadn't for 25 years, citing one incident in which McCain said, about Senator Diane Feinstein, to "get that fucking bitch out of my office."
McCain has few friends. He's a reckless, tyrannical, bully--volatile and irritable--my friends.

Monday, October 6, 2008

"The Rack" and Modern Politics

Do you ever feel like you're on the rack and the bad guys are turning it?

Helplessness is the most destructive human emotion, worse than grief, self-hatred, guilt, or anxiety. Helplessness is so toxic, in fact, that we'll do anything to try to alleviate it. We'll even become self-blaming--e.g. it wasn't that my parents beat me and I couldn't do anything about it...it was just that I was bad. Often, we get enraged. Rage is simultaneously a reaction to helplessness and an ineffective way to try to master it.

For me, and many others, this election stirs up feelings of helplessness and, therefore, rage. I'm doing what I can to help the good guys win, but so much of what's said and done is obviously out of my control. And my love for and belief in Obama only makes it worse; when he gets slimed, I feel slimed and helpless to do anything about it.

I have spent much of my professional and political life trying to understand people who are fucked up, both in my consulting room and in the society at large. And I believe at the deepest level that people do bad or dumb things for reasons that make psychological sense if you really put yourself in their shoes.

Still, I'm human. I can't help it. I hate McCain, Palin, and the neo-cons and christian fundamentalists making up his base. When I read again about another lie, baldly repeated and propagated in the face of universal condemnation, I want tro rip their throats out. When McCain insinuates -- as he and Palin and the Rove-termites working for them are now doing--that Obama is a terrorist, a muslim, connected to palestinians, etc., I want to stick a shit-dipped punji in his eyes. And when I hear the so-called "ordinary guy or gal" say that he or she does think that Obama is a Muslim despite being told 22 times he's not, I want to do the same to them. You fucking morons, you racist, small-minded, anxious, self-righteous victims turning on the only champion you'll ever have in favor of someone who despises you and your social class---you should rot in hell, the hell that this society will become if McCain wins. THEN we'll have a nation of whiners--you --and a little part of me will think--serves you fuckheads right!

Whew! Well, you know, that particular flavor of vomit fortunately doesn't dominate me, nor do I act on it or advocate it for a second.

But--hey--come on...the most "reasonable" leftist opinion leaders I know all feel a version of this...We just don'e say it in print.

Sunday, October 5, 2008

"People are feeling...." YOU DON'T HAVE THE FAINTEST IDEA!!!!

Hardly a news program goes by where someone--an expert, a pundit, a campaign flack--doesn't say something like "people are wondering if McCain is really tuned in..." or "people feel angry at Wall Street for riding high all these years.." Usually, the person speaking is imagining that "people" feel (fortunately) just like him or her. Of course, such speakers also have their heads completely up their asses, since they don't have any direct experience of what "people" think. They don't talk to people outside their narrow little fucking universe of other pundits or politicians or political parasites orbiting those in power. Occasionally they read polls which also don't tell us much. Why? Because questions are framed in ways that don't really get at what people feel at anything other than a superficial level, and a level defined by the pollster and the prevailing political blathering.

The fact is that few people really "listen" to others. Few people actually spend the time and have the curiosity and empathy to really find out what "people" think--even if they COULD EVER BE SUCH A THING AS THE GODDAMN "PEOPLE" WHICH THERE ISN'T. It reminds me of meetings or conferences where someone says "you know, Michael, people are feeling that they're not really being heard..." and it turns out that 2 out of 67 people said that. These talking head-fuckwads should be made to actually go out into the world, be trained to listen, and take a shot at earning their millions of dollars by hearing people in different social classes and ethnic groups actually talk about their lives.

Saturday, October 4, 2008

What's the Chance Reporters Will Confront McCain Campaign About This?

Hey, do you think that the next time David Gregory or Wolfie talks to McCain, he's confront him about this shocker (courtesy of my brother, Joe) from the VP debate?

Just A Thought....

Friday, October 3, 2008

To the Left: Beware of Mitch Kupchack

During the 1985 Laker/Celtics NBA Championship series, the matchups -- Bird/Magic, Kareem/Parrish, D. Johnson/Scott--were so overanalyzed that commentators were looking for something new to say. One day, Tommy Heinsohn weighed in by saying that Lakers backup center Mitch Kupchack was "the key." Uhhh...no, Tommy, he wasn't. Tommy was just looking for something counter-intuitive, something that wasn't obvious, to say.

Today, while progressives are savoring the strong performance of Joe Biden last night, tolerating the popular spin that Palin "stopped the bleeding" with her Stepford Candidate performance last night, I notice in various blogs the notion emerging that actually Palin's performance was good, that it was very strong, that unbeknownst to the liberal East Coast elite, her performance played very well in the heartland. I think this is like being reminded about Mitch Kupchack. "Hey, liberals--don't notice the obvious, don't use common sense, don't trust any of your instincts......the reality is different and scary and right there under your nose...Palin was terrific and you can't see it..."

Our guys are gaining momentum. They're going to win and possibly win big. And that scares us because we've been robbed and fooled and traumatically disappointed before. So--we're knocking on wood anytime we feel too hopeful or any time our experience and reality-sense detects positive hopeful things, like that debate last night. We pull back, warn each other not to get too celebratory, caution ourselves that we really are out of touch with the American people and that for all we know black could be white and vice versa.

In my view, it's not. We were not banking on Palin torpedoing the McCain campaign anyway, and Biden significantly helped us last night and we should be happy about it!

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Here's What Kills Me....

Wolf or Anderson or someone will not infrequently ask one of their "experts" ---- "What do you hear on the campaign trail from independents, Candy"....or "you were there in the hall, Joe--what was the feeling like THERE?"
Invariably, they DON'T REALLY KNOW BUT PRETEND THEY DO. These fuckhead spinners DON'T SPEAK TO ANYONE OUTSIDE THE ECHO CHAMBER OF POLITICAL CONSULTANTS AND OTHER TALKING HEADS. They report the effect of x, y, or z by regurgitating what other beltway wonks are saying....it's a creepy psychotic feeling, if you think about it....

It's a Goddamn House of Mirrors

Yeah, yeah, one sees what one wants to see. Is it not experientially clear that Palin was Stepford-like in her recitation of canned answers---like a kid using "adult language" in a slightly uncomfortable way? Come on? Is that not something that A SINGLE FUCKING COMMENTATOR could mention? No. They analyze the performance of false selves and phony theater speaking without a scintilla of deep conviction or passion as if it were REAL. it makes me want to gag.

Stepford Candidate?

How do you do that?

How do you smile while talking? It's like the Miss America pageant -- the personal interview section. They do it....Sarah does it.....I can't do it? Can you?

I'm As Proud As Mitch McConnell..

Yep, watching Senators McConnell, Reid, Gregg and Dodd congratulate each other last night for passing the Rescue-Plan-With-Much-Needed-Tax-Cuts-For-Business made me proud, proud that we have a bunch of rich, bloviating, pasty-white, flabby narcissists falling all over themselves honoring each other for their great political courage, the courage they showed passing a bill that barely staves off a total imminent economic conflagration for a short while, while caving into the crass extortion from the far-right nutballs in the House. Boy--these 4 egomaniacal tubs of lard really make me proud to be an American! They should have their own Mt. Rushmore. Perhaps -- after the revolution -- we can build them one in D-Block at San Quentin.

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

The Creepiness That Cannot Speak Its Name

Here's 2 things that Dems can't really say in public: 1) that McCain has systematically and consistently voted against veterans and 2) that prior to McCain's noble sacrifice in a North Vietnamese POW camp, he was a cocky asshole flyboy who killed thousands of innocent Vietnamese civilians in bombing raids in an immoral, illegal, and ultimately discredited war.

I'm not saying that we should about this shit, but only that it's a pathetic commentary on our current political climate and our revisionist view of Vietnam that we can't.

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Oh, Aren't We Liberal Intellectuals So Special!

I love watching Olbermann et all on MSNBC. Keeps me sane. But they're starting to bug the shit out of me with what can come off as a smarmy insider-ness that is unnecessary and -- I can imagine -- offensive to some people we might want on our side.

So, We all know that Sarah Palin is an idiot--a joke of a candidate. She's ridiculous, embarrassing, etc.

Tonight, however, Olbermann and his guests mock her for not knowing a single Supreme Court decision other than Roe v. Wade, saying things like, "I mean, she could have at least mentioned Marbury v. Madison or Plessy v. Ferguson or ......." Yeah, Keith--that bimbo really should have mentioned Marbury or Plessy...let's see...I have a doctorate..hmm...is that Stephon Marbury who plays for the Knicks? Or ..Plessy...gee...right...that's a real household name, Keith....what fucking idiot wouldn't--off the cuff-- know about the famous Plessy v. Ferguson, right? I remember these names from high school American History, but they're not exactly on the tip of my tongue.

So, rather than doing your circle-jerk with other liberals "in-the-know" thereby confirming the view of many that we're condescending douche-bags, you might be more discriminating about which display of ignorance Palin reveals.

Wall Street, Main Street, and LSD

30 years or more ago, my friends and I used to occasionally take LSD. When we tripped, we'd sometimes have epiphanies about life, love, and the foibles of the human race. Sometimes, one of us would key in on a word and repeat it until it lost all meaning, e.g. "Hey--did you ever think about the word scissors?" ....and we'd repeat it until the group dissolved in either laughter or profound self-congratulatory insight.

Aren't you getting tired of hearing people talk about Wall Street and Main Street. The most right-wing, business-oriented, robber-baron-istic ruthlesslessly self-centered asshole talks about the evils of "Wall Street" and what's good for "Main Street." They've lost their meaning. They're like scissors and we're all on acid nodding our heads in understanding of words that no longer signify anything.

Suck and Swallow

It's all well and good for progressives to hate this bailout and scream about welfare for the rich, but here are 2 realities at this particular moment in time: 1) businesses can't get lines of credit to start, expand, or even at times maintain their operations, and 2) this Congress isn't going to nationalize the banking industry in Sweden-like ways. #1 means that economic activity is slowing down at an even faster rate than it was under pre-crisis fucked up conditions. And "economic activity" represents not only profits but people's livelihoods and security. Outrage at the rape of the economic commons by the Wall Street profiteers feels good but is also the typical helpless flailing-about of the Left who'd rather be "right" than helpful. Even progressive economists like Krugman and DeLong took their compazine and supported the bill. So, when you read folks on the Left expressing relief or some type of moral victory at the defeat of the bill--a defeat primarily engineered by fucked-up right-wing free market nazis--I think you should tell them, no thank you--I don't reallly want to commit suicide today...

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Psychology and Politics

Everybody is a psychologist nowadays. Pundits raise the issue of "character" at the drop of a hat. We apparently don't really "know" Obama well enough. Bush is an idiot but has decent, albeit simpleminded "values." Bill Clinton's "character" was sullied because he was obsessed with sex. Hillary is a "ball-buster" who threatens men, but Joe Biden is a good guy because he raised his kids and takes the train home every night.

Fact is, we don't know shit, and should stop pretending that we do.

I don't even know shit, and I study character and psychology for a living.

In our culture of celebrity, everyone's an expert, entitled it seems to weigh in with psychological judgements about people about whose real personal life they know squat. Give me a fucking break! We don't "know" Obama? What the fuck do you want to know? His sexual fantasies? Whether he wipes his ass sitting down or standing up? The cute names he calls Michelle at home? You know more than enough to decide how to vote for him. So, Wolf Blitzer, quit "reporting" this as a relevant fact unless you attempt to actually understand what it really means when someone tells a pollster that he or she doens't "know" Obama. Otherwise, Wolf, you're just repeating the undigested code words and idiocy of the public as if we all know what they mean.

Fact is, we have no fucking idea what any of these folks are really like and should stop acting like we do.

Victory, Middle Class, and Angels on the Head of a Pin

So, according to the NYTimes, the Obama Campaign is running ads mentioning that McCain never mentioned the words "middle class" during the debate, while McCain's ads point out that Obama never mentioned the word "Victory." Neither of them, I want to point out, mentioned my name once--which hurts--nor the words "crumb cake" which would have offended my grandmother if she'd been alive. What a load of crap. "Victory," of course, signifies McCain's delusional jingoistic testosterone fantasies of world domination, and "middle class" signifies the focus-group tested appelation for "all of us" who are pissed off that we're not rich and goddamned-if-we're-gonna'-be-labelled-poor.

Saturday, September 27, 2008

The Media Echo-Chamber

I know that we're supposed to talk about presidential politics, including the debate, like it's a sporting event--Obama "held serve," McCain threw a "hail mary" pass, etc. Here's the thing, though...these are creations of pundits and "experts" who then report them as if they were real things. They weigh in on the contest as if they're only reporting something, while in actuality they're creating it. Reality disappears. It drives me nuts. McCain, I guess, was strong because he knew some hard-to-pronounce names of countries and leaders and Obama was good because he made eye contact and didn't say something to humiliate himself. Listeners, innoculated to pundit-speak, may even mirror these silly judgments. It's like a giant echo chamber or house of mirrors, a sort of political Truman Show in which generalizations and metaphors are thrown around and offered up as if they were something real.

McCain, by all accounts, including a recent "off-the-record" account by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, is an angry and bitter guy with a hair-trigger temper who recently said to Senator Diane Feinstein to "get the fuck out of my office, you stupid bitch." He's a reckless war-monger. If he'd been President during the Cuban Missile Crisis, we'd all be radioactive today. And yet Wolf Blitzer and Andrea Mitchell can talk about how McCain was "strong" on international politics because he boasted of his travels and knew the names of the breakaway province of Georgia. What the fuck? They think they're analyzing a public perception, or speaking on its behalf, while in reality they're just reinforcing--if not creating--the goddamn thing.